Key points for company leaders
This article reflects information available on the afternoon of 23 October 2026 (Japan time). Both incidents are still under investigation. For the latest, check the announcements listed in the sources at the end.
What happened
According to NEC, a company it uses for system development and maintenance was attacked in late September. Stolen credentials for a legitimate account were used to access NEC customers' systems from the contractor's device, and files on servers were encrypted, leaving systems unusable.[1]
What leaked
Files leaked from cloud storage that NEC set up and used to share information between customers, NEC and contractors. They contained customers' personal data and system information. Osaka Metropolitan University says it was told that personal data and system information related to the university leaked.[1][2]
A second case
On 21 October RAKUS said an outsider broke into two API servers of its subsidiary's email delivery service Blastmail and took every contract customer's company name, contact names, phone numbers, email addresses, and contract and payment history. For some customers, delivery lists also leaked.[3]
What to do this week
List every contractor and subcontractor account that can log in to your systems and cloud services, disable the ones no longer used, and check where they connect from and whether they use multi-factor authentication. Also review whether storage you share with contractors holds more personal data or passwords than it needs to.[4][5]
What happened in the attack through NEC's contractor
NEC's 20 October statement describes two kinds of damage. First, a legitimate account was used from the contractor's device to access customers' system environments, and files on servers were encrypted, leaving various systems unusable. Second, files leaked from cloud storage used to share information among the parties. NEC says it has contacted the affected customers individually and will report details of the leaked personal data to them as they become clear.[1]
Figure 1
The intrusion path as published
The contractor was attacked and credentials for a legitimate account were stolen; that account was used from the contractor's device to reach customers' systems, files were encrypted, and files leaked from shared storage.
The contractor is attacked
Late September
Credentials for a legitimate account are stolen
Customer systems are accessed from the contractor's device
Files are encrypted and shared storage leaks
In its fifth notice on 21 October, Osaka Metropolitan University said NEC, which maintains and operates its core systems, reported that the outage of 2 October was caused by unauthorised access to the university's systems using a legitimate account held by NEC's subcontractor. The university says it is still confirming with NEC what leaked and how much.[2]
The business systems the university said at its 5 October press conference might have leaked data (including about 130,000 records related to academic affairs) sit on the university's own virtualisation platform, and are separate from the information in NEC's cloud storage. Whether data leaked from that platform is still under investigation.[2]
The other shape: a leak at the service provider
According to RAKUS's second report on 21 October, an outsider broke into two API servers of its subsidiary RAKUS Light Cloud, ran commands, connected to the sales management system and the service database, and took data out. The company says it does not hold credit card numbers. The service has been down since 00:30 on 21 October with no restart date, and the exact entry route is still under investigation.[3]
The NEC case is about a contractor's access being used to get into your own systems. The Blastmail case is about data you entrusted to a provider being taken from that provider's systems. Either way, however well you secure your own servers, a breach on a partner's side can still stop your systems or leak your data.[1][3]
Figure 2
The two cases side by side
In the NEC case the way in was a contractor's legitimate account, leading to outages and a leak from shared storage. In the Blastmail case the way in was the provider's API servers, and contract customer data and some delivery lists were taken.
| Way in | What happened | What customers should check | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Via NEC's contractor | A contractor's legitimate account (stolen credentials) | Systems down from encrypted files; leak from shared cloud storage | Contractor and subcontractor accounts and where they connect from; what is in shared storage |
| Blastmail | Two of the provider's API servers (entry route under investigation) | All contract customer data and some delivery lists taken; service stopped | What data you entrusted, individual notices from the provider, and a fallback |
Timeline
Figure 3
From the attack on the contractor to disclosure
The contractor was attacked in late September, Osaka Metropolitan University's outage began on 2 October, and NEC disclosed the cause on 20 October. On 21 October Blastmail confirmed data had been taken, and on 23 October JPCERT/CC updated its alert.
- Contractors and providers
- Affected organisations
- Japanese agencies
Late Sep 2026 · Contractors and providers
NEC's contractor is attacked
2 Oct 2026 · Affected organisations
Osaka Metropolitan University's core systems go down
5 Oct 2026 · Affected organisations
The university holds a press conference
Names business systems that may have leaked data (about 130,000 academic records and more)
8 Oct 2026 · Japanese agencies
JPCERT/CC issues an alert on intrusions at Japanese organisations
JPCERT-AT-2026-0030
20 Oct 2026 17:00 · Contractors and providers
NEC discloses the intrusion via its contractor and the leak
21 Oct 2026 00:30 · Contractors and providers
Blastmail stops its service
21 Oct 2026 11:30 · Affected organisations
The university's fifth notice names the cause
Access using a legitimate account held by NEC's subcontractor
21 Oct 2026 · Contractors and providers
RAKUS's second report confirms all contract customer data was taken
23 Oct 2026 · Japanese agencies
JPCERT/CC updates its alert
Adds Case E and more
Six things to check this week
IPA's collection of practices describes identifying contractors that carry cyber risk, checking their security through a questionnaire, and reporting the gaps to leadership so the organisation can decide what to do. Its sample questionnaire even asks whether the contractor knows how well its own subcontractors are secured. In light of these incidents, check the following.[4][6]
- Take stock of accounts: list every contractor and subcontractor account that can log in to your servers, cloud services, admin screens and VPN, and disable those whose contract has ended or that are no longer used.[4][5]
- Ask about subcontracting: check whether your contractors hand work on to other companies, and if so, which accounts those companies use.[2][4]
- Check where they connect from and how they sign in: confirm which devices and routes contractors use to connect, and whether they use multi-factor authentication. As one countermeasure, NEC is lending contractors devices it manages.[1][5]
- Review shared storage: check whether cloud storage used with contractors holds more personal data, passwords or configuration details than it needs, and delete what is not needed. JPCERT/CC also advises not keeping data past its retention period or purpose.[1][5]
- Know what you have entrusted: list the customer lists and contact data you keep in outside cloud services such as email delivery, and confirm that the contact address registered with each provider is current.[3][4]
- Check logging and first response: confirm you record contractor account logins and actions, and that you know whom to call and what to do if something looks wrong. JPCERT/CC recommends reviewing defences against lateral movement after a breach, as well as intrusion detection and first response.[5][6]
Sample questions for contractors (IPA)
Do you have a security policy? Is there a security management structure for the work you do for us? Do you train the people doing it? Do you know how well your subcontractors are secured?[4]
Sample questions on outside attacks (IPA)
Do you restrict network paths? Do you have intrusion prevention in place? Do you monitor for malicious traffic? Do you have incident response and recovery procedures?[4]
If a partner tells you it has been breached
- Find out what was affected: both NEC and RAKUS say they will contact affected customers individually. Keep a record of what they tell you and work out which of your data is involved.[1][3]
- Change credentials the partner used: change or revoke passwords and API keys you shared with the partner. JPCERT/CC recommends being able to revoke API tokens quickly when a leak is suspected.[5]
- Prepare for knock-on harm to customers: JPCERT/CC suggests telling customers in advance how to protect themselves if a leak happens, for example with multi-factor authentication.[5]
- Know whom to ask: JPCERT/CC accepts requests for help with incident response.[5] A personal data leak may also require reports to the authorities and notices to the people affected under Japanese law, so get expert advice early.
JPCERT/CC also updated its alert on 23 October
JPCERT/CC updated its alert on the wave of intrusions at Japanese organisations (JPCERT-AT-2026-0030) on 23 October. It added Case E: attackers abusing AI-driven penetration testing platforms such as Cairn, CyberStrikeAI and ARTEX to probe mainly internet-facing web applications for vulnerabilities and to try to steal configuration and backup files. This includes attempts against internet-facing WSUS servers.[5]
Case B in the same alert lists attackers using API keys stolen in breaches of other systems. The lesson is the same as in the NEC case: credentials stolen somewhere else can become the way into your company. The alert also lists suspicious source IP addresses, which you can use to check your own and your contractors' logs.[5]
FAQ
Printable checklist
- Listed every contractor and subcontractor account that can log in to our systems
- Disabled accounts whose contract has ended or that are no longer used
- Checked whether our contractors pass work on to other companies
- Checked where contractors connect from (devices and routes) and whether they use multi-factor authentication
- Removed unneeded personal data and passwords from storage we share with contractors
- Listed the customer lists and contact data we keep in outside services
- Confirmed the contact details registered with each provider are current
- Logged contractor account sign-ins and actions, and assigned someone to review them
- Checked our own and our contractors' logs for the suspicious IP addresses in JPCERT/CC's alert
- Agreed whom to contact and what to do first if a partner is breached
How ZeroKai can help
When contractors run things for you, it is easy to lose track of which servers and admin screens can be seen from the internet. ZeroKai takes your domain, lists the host names recorded in Certificate Transparency logs and highlights names that look like admin screens or test environments. For domains whose ownership you have verified, it also shows exposed remote access, file sharing, database and FTP services observed by Shodan. You can use it as a list of what is visible from outside when you go through these checks with your contractors.
Sources
Numbers in [brackets] in the text refer to these sources. Links checked on 13 October 2026.
- [1]NEC Corporation, Apology for customer system outages and data leaks caused by unauthorised access at a contractor (Japanese), 20 October 2026
- [2]Osaka Metropolitan University, Outage of the university's core information systems, fifth notice: system outage and data leak from the cyber attack disclosed by the contractor (Japanese), 21 October 2026
- [3]RAKUS Co., Ltd., Second report: data leak and service suspension due to unauthorised access at Blastmail, provided by our subsidiary (Japanese), 21 October 2026
- [4]IPA, Practices for the Cybersecurity Management Guidelines Ver 3.0: Practice 9-1, identifying contractors with cyber risk and checking their measures (Japanese), 28 April 2026
- [5]JPCERT/CC, Alert on the recent series of intrusions at Japanese organisations (JPCERT-AT-2026-0030, updated 23 October, Japanese), 23 October 2026
- [6]IPA, Practices for the Cybersecurity Management Guidelines Ver 3.0: Instruction 9, understanding and securing the whole supply chain including business partners and contractors (Japanese), 28 April 2026
Before you talk to your contractors, list what you expose
Enter your domain and create an account to start a free passive assessment right away. It is free for one ownership-verified domain, and ZeroKai never contacts your servers.
Newsletter
Japan-focused cybersecurity news that could affect companies like yours, in plain language. Twice a week, Mondays and Wednesdays.
