Key points
- Ransomware cases reported to the National Police Agency (NPA) numbered 226 in 2025, and have stayed around 200 a year since 2022.[1][2]
- Of the 226 cases in 2025, 143 were small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Size is no protection.[1]
- In the NPA's survey of victims (92 valid answers), 66.3% said attackers came in through VPN devices and 20.7% through remote desktop. Both are doors that can be seen from the internet.[1]
- The first step is knowing what can be seen from outside. ZeroKai reads only public records and shows that view, with evidence.
Ransomware in Japan remains high
According to the NPA, ransomware cases reported by companies and other organisations were 230 in 2022, 197 in 2023, 222 in 2024 and 226 in 2025.[2][3][4][1] The NPA describes 2025 as remaining at a high level.[5]

Figure 1
Ransomware cases reported to the NPA, by organisation size (2022–2025)
Reported cases were 230 in 2022, 197 in 2023, 222 in 2024 and 226 in 2025. SMEs were the largest group every year, with 143 cases in 2025.
- SMEs
- Large companies
- Other organisations
Show the data as a table
| SMEs (cases) | Large companies (cases) | Other organisations (cases) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 121 | 63 | 46 |
| 2023 | 102 | 71 | 24 |
| 2024 | 140 | 61 | 21 |
| 2025 | 143 | 64 | 19 |
Of the 226 cases in 2025, 143 were SMEs and 64 were large companies.[1] In the first half of 2025 alone, SMEs accounted for 77 cases, about two thirds, the highest count and share on record. The NPA links this to Ransomware-as-a-Service, which lets far more people launch attacks, reaching smaller firms whose defences tend to be thinner.[6]
The methods are getting worse. Of the 153 cases where police could confirm the method, 136 (88.9%) were double extortion: data was stolen as well as encrypted, with a threat to publish it.[1] By industry, manufacturing made up about 40%.[5]
Most attacks come through doors visible from outside
Every year the NPA asks victims how the attackers got in. In 2025, of 92 valid answers, 61 (66.3%) said through a VPN device and 19 (20.7%) through remote desktop.[1] The pattern has held since 2022.
Figure 2
How ransomware got in (NPA victim survey, 2022–2025)
Entry through VPN devices was 62% in 2022, 63% in 2023, 55% in 2024 and 66.3% in 2025. Remote desktop was 19%, 18%, 31% and 20.7%.
- VPN devices
- Remote desktop
Show the data as a table
| VPN devices (%) | Remote desktop (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 62% | 19% |
| 2023 | 63% | 18% |
| 2024 | 55% | 31% |
| 2025 | 66.3% | 20.7% |
The NPA points to very weak IDs and passwords, and to unneeded accounts left unmanaged. In one case an overseas office's equipment was not being managed, and the attackers used it to reach the head office in Japan.[7] Not knowing what you expose to the internet is a risk in itself.
Surveys of smaller firms show the same thing. In IPA's FY2024 survey, 48.0% of companies hit by unauthorised access said a vulnerability, such as a missing patch, was exploited, and 19.8% were breached via a business partner or group company.[8]
Global research agrees. Verizon's 2025 Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR) found that exploiting vulnerabilities was the initial access vector in 20% of breaches, up 34% on the year before.[9] Edge devices and VPNs were 22% of the targets of that exploitation, almost eight times the 3% seen a year earlier. Only about 54% of those vulnerabilities were fully fixed, and the median time to fix was 32 days.[10]
The US agency CISA publishes the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog: vulnerabilities that attackers are confirmed to be using. The 8 October 2026 edition lists 1,739 entries, 361 of them marked as known to be used in ransomware campaigns. 245 were added during 2025.[11]
Figure 3
Entries added to CISA's KEV catalog per year (2021–2025)
Entries added: 311 in 2021, 555 in 2022, 187 in 2023, 186 in 2024 and 245 in 2025.
Show the data as a table
| Entries added (entries) | |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 311 |
| 2022 | 555 |
| 2023 | 187 |
| 2024 | 186 |
| 2025 | 245 |
Note: Counted by year from the dateAdded field in CISA's KEV JSON feed (8 October 2026 edition). 2021 includes the entries loaded when the catalog launched.
Source: [11]
Notable incidents in Japan
The damage is not limited to any one industry. Below are major cases from the past few years, based on what the companies and public bodies themselves announced.

July 2023
Port of Nagoya (Nagoya United Terminal System)
A ransomware infection stopped container gate-in and gate-out for about three days. 37 ships had their cargo-handling schedules disrupted, and an estimated 20,000 containers were affected. [12]
June 2024
KADOKAWA Group
Services centred on niconico went down. Personal data of 254,241 people was confirmed leaked. The root cause is believed to be an employee's account credentials stolen through phishing or a similar attack. [13]
December 2024
Japan Airlines (JAL)
A flood of data was sent at the router linking JAL's internal and external networks (a DDoS attack), causing a system outage. 71 domestic and international flights were delayed by 30 minutes or more and 4 were cancelled. No customer data was leaked. [14]
September 2025
October 2025
ASKUL
Ransomware encrypted ASKUL's logistics systems and shipping from its distribution centres stopped entirely. The attackers are believed to have entered with stolen credentials, and backups were encrypted and deleted too. According to Tokyo Shoko Research, about 739,700 personal records may have been leaked, and the company booked an extraordinary loss of ¥5.216 billion for the outage. [17] [16]
The damage: outages, leaks, and long recoveries
In the NPA's survey of 2025 victims, more than half of organisations spent ¥10 million or more in total on investigation and recovery. Only just over half recovered within a month, and recoveries are tending to drag on.[5]
Smaller firms are hit hard too. In IPA's survey, the average loss from a cyber incident was ¥730,000 (up to ¥100 million), and recovery took 5.8 days on average. About 70% of affected companies said their business partners were affected as well.[8]
Data leaks are rising as well. Tokyo Shoko Research counted 180 personal-data leak or loss incidents announced by listed companies and their subsidiaries in 2025, covering 30,636,910 people, almost double the year before. The most common cause was malware or unauthorised access: 116 incidents (64.4%).[16]
Figure 4
Causes of personal-data leaks at listed companies in Japan (2025)
Of 180 incidents, malware or unauthorised access was the top cause with 116. Misdisplay or missent email was 37, loss or mistaken disposal 18, and theft by insiders 7.
Show the data as a table
| Incidents (incidents) | |
|---|---|
| Malware / unauthorised access | 116 |
| Misdisplay / missent | 37 |
| Loss / mistaken disposal | 18 |
| Insider theft | 7 |
Note: Main causes only; the bars do not add up to 180.
Source: [16]
Worldwide, IBM's 2025 study put the average cost of a data breach at USD 4.44 million. In the United States it reached a record USD 10.22 million.[18]
What experts rank as the top threats
In IPA's “10 Major Security Threats 2026” for organisations, ransomware is number one for the eleventh year running, followed by attacks on supply chains and contractors. The list also includes exploitation of system vulnerabilities (4th), attacks on remote-work environments (8th) and DDoS (9th).[19]
Start by knowing how you look from outside
The statistics and incidents above share one thing: attackers look at a company from the internet first, searching for a way in. Exposed VPN devices, remote desktop, forgotten servers at a branch office, a mail domain with weak settings. All of these can be seen from outside.

Yet IPA found that about 70% of SMEs have no organised security function, and 62.6% made no security investment in the past three fiscal years.[8] Companies need a way to start by learning how they look from outside, even without a dedicated security person.
What ZeroKai does
ZeroKai takes a domain name, reads what is already public about it on the internet, and organises the risks visible from outside.
- It never contacts the target. No port scans, no page loads, and DNS queries go through public resolvers.
- What it checks: email authentication (SPF and DMARC) and DNS settings, host names recorded in Certificate Transparency logs, domain registration and expiry, and network information for IP addresses. Public services (from Shodan's observations) are included only for domains you have verified.
- Details are for the owner only. Asset lists and finding details appear only when your email domain matches, or when a DNS TXT record confirms ownership.
- Every finding comes with its evidence, its source and the time it was seen, so you can show it to colleagues or business partners as is.
- Anything that could not be read is shown as “not covered”, never as “no problem”.
- Vulnerability intelligence from CISA KEV and JVN iPedia is loaded regularly and can be browsed in the console. Automatically matching CVEs to your assets is planned for later.
Why it helps
- You can start without a dedicated security person. All you need is a domain and an account.
- You see the same outside view an attacker sees, and which issues to fix first.
- Because findings carry evidence and timestamps, they help when a customer asks about your security. In IPA's survey, 42.1% of companies that had received a security request from a customer said meeting it was a major factor in winning the business.[8]
- Because it never talks to your systems, it puts no load on production.
What you can do today
- List every VPN device and remote desktop you expose to the internet, including those at overseas offices and group companies.[7]
- Remove accounts nobody uses and replace weak passwords.[7] Turn on multi-factor authentication as well.
- Keep logs as a matter of routine, and store backups offline too.[7]
- Regularly check whether vulnerabilities listed in KEV affect your equipment.[11]
- Check how your domain looks from outside. A free ZeroKai assessment is one way to start.
Sources
Numbers in [brackets] in the text refer to these sources. Links checked on 13 October 2026.
- [1]National Police Agency, White Paper on Police 2026, Chapter 3: Cyberspace security, July 2026
- [2]National Police Agency, White Paper on Police 2023: Ransomware, 2023
- [3]National Police Agency, White Paper on Police 2024: Ransomware, 2024
- [4]National Police Agency, White Paper on Police 2025: Ransomware, 2025
- [5]National Police Agency, Cyber Affairs Bureau, Cyber threat landscape in 2025 (Reiwa 7), March 2026
- [6]National Police Agency, Cyber Affairs Bureau, Cyber threat landscape in the first half of 2025, September 2025
- [7]National Police Agency, Cyber Affairs Bureau, Cyber threat landscape in 2024 (Reiwa 6), 13 March 2025
- [8]Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan (IPA), FY2024 survey of information security at SMEs (preliminary results), 14 February 2025
- [9]Verizon, Verizon’s 2025 Data Breach Investigations Report (news release), 23 April 2025
- [10]Verizon, 2025 Data Breach Investigations Report: Executive Summary, 23 April 2025
- [11]US CISA, Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog (JSON feed, 8 October 2026 edition; retrieved 13 October 2026), 8 October 2026
- [12]Cabinet Secretariat of Japan, Response to the Nagoya Port container terminal system outage (Material 2), January 2024
- [13]KADOKAWA Corporation, Notice on the information leak caused by the ransomware attack, 5 August 2024
- [14]Aviation Wire, JAL: 71 flights delayed and 4 cancelled on the 26th after system outage, 26 December 2024
- [15]Asahi Group Holdings, Investigation Results and Future Measures on Cyberattack Data Exposure, 27 November 2025
- [16]Tokyo Shoko Research, Personal-data leaks at listed companies in 2025: 180 incidents, 30.63 million people, 30 January 2026
- [17]ASKUL Corporation, Report on the impact of the ransomware attack and security measures (13th update), 12 December 2025
- [18]IBM, Cost of a Data Breach Report 2025 (press release), 30 July 2025
- [19]Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan (IPA), 10 Major Security Threats 2026, 29 January 2026
Terms and questions from this article
Related articles
- Threats · Fragnesia (CVE-2026-46300): Linux kernel privilege escalation now on CISA KEV — remediate by 31 October
- News · GMO's Onamae.com Desktop Cloud extortion case and So-net's 2.59 million-record leak: what companies should check this week
- Threats · BlockStrap, a 10.0-severity flaw in Magento and Adobe Commerce: what companies with online shops should check this week
See how your domain looks from outside
Enter your domain and create an account to start an assessment right away. ZeroKai never contacts your servers.
Newsletter
Japan-focused cybersecurity news that could affect companies like yours, in plain language. Twice a week, Mondays and Wednesdays.
